Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:59:20 +0100 From: David Taylor <davidt@yadt.co.uk> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux_statfs64() missing an argument?? Message-ID: <20070408205920.GA98399@outcold.yadt.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20070408194326.GA77190@rink.nu> References: <20070408191012.GA95373@outcold.yadt.co.uk> <20070408194326.GA77190@rink.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007, Rink Springer wrote: > Hi David, > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:10:13PM +0100, David Taylor wrote: > > I'm currently recompiling my kernel to test this, but thought I'd see > > if anyone had any comments on the patch as is, since I've probably done > > something wrong, as I'm not too sure how the whole syscalls.master setup > > works. I have now tested this, and it compiles and works correctly (at least, statfs returns success, thus satisying autoconf, I'll find out shortly if df displays the right values). > Looks good to me. However, as you might have seen, some files are > flagged "Do not edit". I believe editing a syscalls.master file will > automatically invoke a rebuild of these files, and thus, they need not > be part of your patch. > > Have you tried whether the appropriate files are automatically > regenerated? I wasn't too sure whether to include the diffs for those files (which did automatically regenerate), but since they exist in CVS, I decided to keep them. -- David Taylor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070408205920.GA98399>