Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 23:22:06 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ji@research.att.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports vs. packages Message-ID: <199801210722.XAA20538@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <199801210613.BAA25398@bual.research.att.com> (message from John Ioannidis on Wed, 21 Jan 1998 01:13:42 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Why do people ask this sort of thing on -hackers? -ports, guys, -ports! There's a mailing list for that kind of stuff! * The ports and the packages collection don't seem to be mutually * consistent; there are ports for which there are no packages (which is * not a problem), and packages for which there are no ports (which * is). What gives? Examples please. (And tell me the exact location you found them...it's probably just that I forgot to delete an obsolete package.) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801210722.XAA20538>