Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:51:22 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[4]: Load-Balancing - any solutions? Message-ID: <14894.35498.995877.310310@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <695949064.20001206193229@buz.ch> References: <14893.65098.284631.750737@guru.mired.org> <695949064.20001206193229@buz.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> types: > Wednesday, December 06, 2000, 9:52:26 AM, you wrote: > >> I'm still looking for something somewhat faster (i.e. no more than a few > >> seconds lag between the master and the slave servers)... > > Have you tried integrating the distribution into your source code > > control system? > Ever noticed how "fast" CVS is, for example? I don't want to see > what's going to happen when I fed several gigs of HTML into it... CVS sucks, in a lot of different ways. Judging an idea based on a bad implementation is not good practice. > > http://www.perforce.com/perforce/wcm.html >. I've got a FAQ that adds > > more to this topic somewhere. If you want, I'll chase down a pointer > > to it for you. > Doesn't seem to be what I need. Checking against a master copy just > ain't fast enough, thus the need for a push based system. Wow. It takes my web server (a wimpy 500MHz K6-2) less than a tenth of a second to check against the master copy. Since that's to slow, exactly how tight *are* your requirements? <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Unix/FreeBSD consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14894.35498.995877.310310>