Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:30:31 -0400 From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com> Cc: "re@freebsd.org" <re@freebsd.org>, "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, "nonesuch@longcount.org" <nonesuch@longcount.org> Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 Message-ID: <CAKYr3zxeOCssSq3mouz%2BNWC5-vvAReP2oueU8bFFgFhrmi-dzQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19B7F957-EF1D-4452-986A-3F4C51CA647E@ixsystems.com> References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51D9B24B.8070303@ixsystems.com> <51DACE93.9050608@freebsd.org> <520DC77C.1070003@ixsystems.com> <520DE306.4080004@freebsd.org> <5211EAD0.1060404@freebsd.org> <19B7F957-EF1D-4452-986A-3F4C51CA647E@ixsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com>wrote: > > > On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >>> Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm > wondering can I commit this to > >>> 9-stable now? (or is it already in?) > >> > >> It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after the > >> call for testers. There were a couple of replies that it is being > >> tested but no statements either way if it was good or not. Hence > >> I erred on the side of caution and refrained from committing it. > > > > Revisiting the history of this after vacation absence actually shows > > that we straddled the release code freeze deadline and you had provided > > good testing feedback. However the MFC got rejected by RE on the fear > > of introducing unknown regressions into the release process. > > > >>> Would you do the honors? > >> > >> Yes, will do later today. > > > > Committed to stable/9 as r254515. > > > > Let me know if there are any issues. > > Thanks Andre. > > Maybe we can do a point release/patch release with this in a few weeks > for 9.2.1 or 9.2p1 because 9.2 out of the box performance is abysmal not > only in networking but also disk as maxvnodes is clipped way too small even > with plenty of ram. > > So your saying, 9.2-RELEASE performance suffers degradation against say 9.1 ?? are you referring to with this patch enabled? or just in general 9.2-RELEASE > > > > -- > > Andre > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKYr3zxeOCssSq3mouz%2BNWC5-vvAReP2oueU8bFFgFhrmi-dzQ>