Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Nov 1999 15:26:07 -0800 (PST)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
To:        Herbert Chang <zhang_huabin@hotmail.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Which mail server is the best: qmail, postfix or exim?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911141520250.21345-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <19991114142114.44048.qmail@hotmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Herbert Chang wrote:

> I want to install a mail server on FreeBSD. There are many ports of mail 
> server on http://www.freebsd.org/ports/mail.html. I wonder which is the 
> best:  qmail, postfix, exim or other?

I've found qmail to be a good, robust mailserver - although there are a
couple of non-obvious (to me, anyway) gotchas with interactions between
configuration options. I've never used postfix, but it comes highly
recommended, and is probably better suited to a high-volume server than
qmail.

Personally I'd never consider anything other than those two for the simple
reason that the people who wrote them are security experts and designed
them from scratch to be secure servers. There may never be found another
vulnerability in sendmail again, but why trust that to chance?

I suggest you try them both out: read through the documentation and see
which seems clearest to you, and which covers the features you need most
adequately, do test installs of both if you have time, and then choose
based on that.

Kris

----
Cthulhu for President! For when you're tired of choosing the _lesser_ of
two evils..



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9911141520250.21345-100000>