Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 11:40:01 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com> Cc: mjacob@feral.com, ANDREAS.KLEMM.AK@bayer-ag.de, scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: It%s not the write cache on 3.0-STABLE and not tagged comma Message-ID: <19990213114001.A6068@titan.klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199902121610.JAA34695@panzer.plutotech.com>; from Kenneth D. Merry on Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 09:10:24AM -0700 References: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902120803350.17711-100000@feral-gw> <199902121610.JAA34695@panzer.plutotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > Read performance is fine. (about 12MB/sec) "poor" means between 1 and > 3MB/sec. > > I'll forward you his original mail, I think it probably got nuked by > Majordomo's message size filter. Yes it has been nuked, sorry for that. Jonathan Bresler told me so, but I thought everything is fine, since Ken answered me. -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990213114001.A6068>