Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:06:31 -0800
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        chip <chip@wiegand.org>
Cc:        "chat@FreeBSD.ORG" <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: off topic in chat? Search Engines question
Message-ID:  <20001206180631.A15059@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <3A2EE94F.AF592D18@wiegand.org>; from chip@wiegand.org on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:35:11PM -0800
References:  <3A2EE94F.AF592D18@wiegand.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:35:11PM -0800, chip wrote:
> I have been asked to put some new meta keywords on a web 
> site I made, and the client wants to use almost 30. I have
> tried to explain to them that is probably too many. 
> I have emailed several search engine admins asking them 
> what they consider an appropriate amount, or max number of
> keywords in the meta tags.
> What are the opinions of the people on this list of this topic?

Meta tags may well be dead.  Google doesn't use them because they are
basicaly useless (99.999% of sites with META keywords just make them up
to get hits.)  I suspect other search engines will be moving in the
same direction since everyone is moving towards a model more like
google's then like early search engines.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001206180631.A15059>