Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:41:43 -0400 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, d@delphij.net, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.ORG>, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include string.h src/lib/libc/string Makefile.inc memchr.3 memrchr.c src/sys/sys param.h Message-ID: <20080528184143.GA7624@zim.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0805281049150.7240@sea.ntplx.net> References: <200805272004.m4RK4SZt029194@repoman.freebsd.org> <483C7FF2.6000607@FreeBSD.org> <483C977F.20105@delphij.net> <20080528060333.GA4699@zim.MIT.EDU> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0805281049150.7240@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 28, 2008, Daniel Eischen wrote: > No, all new symbols in 8-current go into FBSD_1.1, not 1.2. The > only time we go to 1.2 is when 8.x branches to 9.0. If for some > reason memrchr() were to change its ABI, then we would go to 1.1.1 > in -current for the ABI change and any subsequent new symbols, and > the MFC to 7.x would also be 1.1.1. > > It is ok for a FBSD_1.1 in -current to be a superset of FBSD_1.1 > in a previous branch. In fact you can't prevent them from being > different unless you mandate that all new symbols get MFC'd to > their respective namespaces in previous branches. Perhaps I misinterpreted what you said about this last year, but I thought you said you didn't want symbols added to existing namespaces in -STABLE. In 7.X, why would it be okay to add new symbols to FBSD_1.1 between releases but not to FBSD_1.0?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080528184143.GA7624>