Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:52:17 -0800 From: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The future of ZFS in FreeBSD Message-ID: <CAPrugNpr1YCo%2Br%2BCCts-uEfdU-nOF6-g15eqODJa_nKia_PwWw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHEMsqbhdcy1GKznVhxKAqCabYHvm_G9oxQR6eQrJ372215E0w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPrugNriggEMMnLTZtf6xNQNYajBYNMnGdN96-ejDYQonoOhgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHEMsqbhdcy1GKznVhxKAqCabYHvm_G9oxQR6eQrJ372215E0w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 14:47 Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks for the write up most appreciated. One of the more meaty > differences is that FreeBSD ZFS still has the only merged and production > ready TRIM support so my question would be are their any plans to address > this before creating the new port as going back to a world without TRIM > support wouldn=E2=80=99t be something I=E2=80=99d look forward to. > Well, then please follow up on the request I CC'd you on a week ago asking that you engage on the deadlist based TRIM PR. That's a better forum for discussing these details than lamenting in public lists. Thanks. -M > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 06:51, Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> The sources for FreeBSD's ZFS support are currently taken directly >> from Illumos with local ifdefs to support the peculiarities of FreeBSD >> where the Solaris Portability Layer (SPL) shims fall short. FreeBSD >> has regularly pulled changes from Illumos and tried to push back any >> bug fixes and new features done in the context of FreeBSD. In the past >> few years the vast majority of new development in ZFS has taken place >> in DelphixOS and zfsonlinux (ZoL). Earlier this year Delphix announced >> that they will be moving to ZoL >> https://www.delphix.com/blog/kickoff-future-eko-2018 This shift means >> that there will be little to no net new development of Illumos. While >> working through the git history of ZoL I have also discovered that >> many races and locking bugs have been fixed in ZoL and never made it >> back to Illumos and thus FreeBSD. This state of affairs has led to a >> general agreement among the stakeholders that I have spoken to that it >> makes sense to rebase FreeBSD's ZFS on ZoL. Brian Behlendorf >> has graciously encouraged me to add FreeBSD support directly to ZoL >> https://github.com/zfsonfreebsd/ZoF so that we might all have a single >> shared code base. >> >> A port for ZoF can be found at https://github.com/miwi-fbsd/zof-port >> Before it can be committed some additional functionality needs to be >> added to the FreeBSD opencrypto framework. These can be found at >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18520 >> >> This port will provide FreeBSD users with multi modifier protection, >> project quotas, encrypted datasets, allocation classes, vectorized >> raidz, vectorized checksums, and various command line improvements. >> >> Before ZoF can be merged back in to ZoL several steps need to be taken: >> - Integrate FreeBSD support into ZoL CI >> - Have most of the ZFS test suite passing >> - Complete additional QA testing at iX >> >> We at iX Systems need to port ZoL's EC2 CI scripts to work with >> FreeBSD and make sure that most of the ZFS Test Suite (ZTS) passes. >> Being integrated in to their CI will mean that, among other things, >> most integration issues will be caught before a PR is merged upstream >> rather than many months later when it is MFVed into FreeBSD. I=E2=80=99m >> hoping to submit the PR to ZoL some time in January. >> >> This port will make it easy for end users on a range of releases to >> run the latest version of ZFS. Nonetheless, transitioning away from an >> Illumos based ZFS is not likely to be entirely seamless. The >> stakeholders I=E2=80=99ve spoken to all agree that this is the best path >> forward but some degree of effort needs to be made to accommodate >> downstream consumers. The current plan is to import ZoF and unhook the >> older Illumos based sources from the build on April 15th or two months >> after iX systems QA deems ZoF stable - which ever comes later. The >> Illumos based sources will be removed some time later - but well >> before 13. This will give users a 3 month period during which both the >> port and legacy Illumos based ZFS will be available to users. Pools >> should interoperate between ZoF and legacy provided the user does not >> enable any features available only in ZoF. We will try to accommodate >> any downstream consumers in the event that they need that date pushed >> back. We ask that any downstream consumers who are particularly >> sensitive to changes start testing the port when it is formally >> announced and report back any issues they have. I will do my best to >> ensure that this message is communicated to all those who it may >> concern. However, I can=E2=80=99t ensure that everyone reads these lists= . That >> is the responsibility of -CURRENT users. >> >> -M >> > _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPrugNpr1YCo%2Br%2BCCts-uEfdU-nOF6-g15eqODJa_nKia_PwWw>