Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 13:26:51 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: current@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Ready to connect libbsdxml (nee libexpat) to the build ! Message-ID: <13046.1033730811@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2002 04:20:19 PDT." <200210041120.g94BKJmn001334@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, I am ready to connect our private brand libexpat to the build now, any final objections ? What was the concensus on the xmlwf program, did we want it in the tree or not ? Would it be useful to anybody or is it just a hackers-proof-of-concept thing ? Poul-Henning In message <200210041120.g94BKJmn001334@freefall.freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kam p writes: >phk 2002/10/04 04:20:19 PDT > > Modified files: > lib/libexpat Makefile > Added files: > lib/libexpat libbsdxml.3 > Log: > Ok, concensus was to install libexpat under a "private brandname", and after > some deliberation the name "libbsdxml" was chosen since it conveys the two > most important attributes: "Private to FreeBSD" and "XML". > > Add a skeleton man-page to give the credit and point for further > documentation. (If somebody wants to write a true mdoc manpage for > this I am sure both the eXpat people and I will be grateful). > > (Still not connected to the build) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.2 +22 -12 src/lib/libexpat/Makefile > 1.1 +59 -0 src/lib/libexpat/libbsdxml.3 (new) > -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13046.1033730811>