Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:34:57 +1000
From:      "Andrew D. Boyd" <decado@gmail.com>
To:        Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
Cc:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: fsck_y_enable: use -C
Message-ID:  <4A27BF71.4030807@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906041613140.1171@woozle.rinet.ru>
References:  <4A23D5A4.6020009@icyb.net.ua> <4A23F4B8.7000002@freebsd.org> <4A240331.1000803@FreeBSD.org> <20090602141231.67987dnz529yuqgw@webmail.leidinger.net> <4A255F8E.70604@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906040018210.1171@woozle.rinet.ru> <4A27B51B.8090504@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906041613140.1171@woozle.rinet.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ah my mistake. Probably best to go with what your patch. I'm thinking it
is intentional so that the man page matches up with the usage.

This patch would be helpful for me thanks for your work.

Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Andrew D. Boyd wrote:
> 
> ADB> If you have a look at -F flag case in fsck_msdosfs/main.c it does not
> ADB> display -F in usage() nor in the man page.
> 
> Well, man page *do* have a reference to -F option, though not in synopsis.
> I'm not sure was it intentional or not.
> 
> ADB> 
> ADB> Perhaps following that might be the way to go?
> ADB> 
> ADB> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> ADB> > On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Doug Barton wrote:
> ADB> > 
> ADB> > DB> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> ADB> > DB> > What about _flags and also adding a NOP for -C in fsck_msdosfs?
> ADB> > DB> 
> ADB> > DB> Sounds great, I look forward to reviewing your patch. :)
> ADB> > 
> ADB> > What do you think about attached one?
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A27BF71.4030807>