Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:22:14 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: John Von Essen <essenz@bjork.quonix.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsh and rcp problems between Solaris and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20031231162214.GA5645@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10312311001250.6247-100000@bjork.quonix.net> References: <20031231095115.GA98228@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10312311001250.6247-100000@bjork.quonix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0500, John Von Essen wrote:
> I can do two rsh's back to back with no problems, its the third (and 4th
> and so on) that hang.
>=20
> On the FreeBSD side, after the first rsh, netstat shows:
>=20
> tcp4 0 0 mx100.851 embryo.bluebell..1021=20
> TIME_WAIT
> tcp4 0 0 mx100.shell embryo.bluebell..1022
> TIME_WAIT
>=20
> Those connections stay around for awhile, about 30 seconds. Only when they
> disappear does the next rsh work.
OK. Some progress. This rules out problems due to limitations in the
number of possible connections you can have open at any one time -- if
the limit is just two, then there would be a lot more things
complaining than just rcp(1). And you'ld have to try exceedingly hard
to get a FBSD system that limited.
Hmmm... What flags are you invoking inetd(8) with on the FreeBSD
side? Specifically are you using any of these (quoting from the
manual page):
-c maximum
Specify the default maximum number of simultaneous invocations=
of
each service; the default is unlimited. May be overridden on a
per-service basis with the "max-child" parameter.
-C rate
Specify the default maximum number of times a service can be
invoked from a single IP address in one minute; the default is
unlimited. May be overridden on a per-service basis with the
"max-connections-per-ip-per-minute" parameter.
-R rate
Specify the maximum number of times a service can be invoked in
one minute; the default is 256. A rate of 0 allows an unlimit=
ed
number of invocations.
-s maximum
Specify the default maximum number of simultaneous invocations=
of
each service from a single IP address; the default is unlimite=
d.
May be overridden on a per-service basis with the "max-child-p=
er-
ip" parameter.
The symptoms you describe could be caused eg. by running with '-s 2'
in the inetd flags (you're getting two socket connections per rsh or
rcp invocation because a second channel is opened to carry the stderr
=66rom the invoked command, but that doesn't count towards inetd's
connection limits).
The default for all of these is unlimited (ie. inetd_flags=3D"-wW") and
there aren't any per-service limits on the rsh (shell) service in the
default inetd.conf. I generally use:
inetd_flags=3D"-wWl -R 1024 -c 128 -a ${hostname}"
in my /etc/rc.conf on internet facing machines where I run inetd(8) --
if this is a purely internal machine (which it certainly should be if
you're using rsh(1) on it) then I wouldn't bother with any sort of
connection rate-limiting, at least for the time being.
Hmmm... As well -- what's the output of:
% sysctl net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack
You might try setting that to zero to turn off delayed ack. That's
where the system will wait for about a minute before sending an ACK in
order to try and coalesce it with a data packet. Usually that's a win
performance-wise. See tcp(4). There's also the RFC1644 support you
might want to try toggling: see ttcp(4) -- I'm unable to find any
definitive statement on the net about Solaris support for this, so no
idea if it will actually help or not.
> As for the rcp, I was missing a trailing slash, apparently rcp -r syntax
> between Solaris and FreeBSD is a little different. So the rcp's work, but
> that take just as long as the rsh calls.
That's one problem down then. Good.
> As for name resolution, the Solaris box uses dns, and so does FreeBSD.
> Both have some entries in the hosts file.
That's good too. Rules out some more areas which could be causing the
trouble.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/8ve2dtESqEQa7a0RAhBjAKCbf3hCpaSL9ufkoyzT7su6xZgEcgCfeq/Q
GT0SSWULt5FEr75qUsp7CQs=
=76Ck
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031231162214.GA5645>