Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:10:28 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@uol.com.br>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make.conf lack of CPUTYPE=k6-3 support Message-ID: <3AAC8474.186B4D58@FreeBSD.org> References: <200103120646.f2C6kjp84242@vic.sabbo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disposition: inline > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 12:29:58AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wr= > > ote: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > Is there anything against adding support for > > > k6-3 to the just added CPUTYPE mechanism? :) > > > My little machine feels left out. Hehehhe > > > I made a simple patch to etc/defaults/make.conf > > > and share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk > > > Should I have touched anything else? > > >=20 > > > Regards, > > >=20 > > > ps: I think this can be MFCed asap (even during the > > > veil period) since it is very straightforward. > > > > Looks fine to me. I'll commit it. > > I see no reason for it. k6-3 is essentially k6-2 core with extra cache on > chip. Threre are no other significant differencies in the features or > instruction set. Not even to mention that there is such a beast as k6-2+.... I would suggest to rename k6-2 into k6/3dnow (similarly to what we have for i586/mmx) and put a note saying that k6/3dnow should be used for k6-2/k6-2+/k6-3. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AAC8474.186B4D58>