Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:06:41 -0400
From:      jason henson <jason@ec.rr.com>
To:        Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ule+preempt?
Message-ID:  <426F2BF1.9010604@ec.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com>
References:  <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Randy Bush wrote:

>having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some months.
>i am wondering if the waters have become relatively safe to go
>to ule with preemption?
>
>randy
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>  
>
I have tried using that combination on a stable machine and have noticed 
2 reboots when in x and once x turning off my monitor but leaving my 
system otherwise fine.  This was over a week's time.  I will be turning 
off preemption when soon.

To elaborate, I have not had issues when not in xorg.  I leave my 
machine on 24/7 doing f@h.  The time my monitor got turned off I let my 
machine continue to run over night.  After I rebooted the next morning I 
checked my logs and f@h continued to function normally and even started 
a new wu.  I have only 1 computer so I can't login to my computer from 
another, which I would like to do to see what x and the rest of the 
system is doing.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426F2BF1.9010604>