Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:12:52 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: acpi shows wrong battery state (fwd) Message-ID: <201009031512.55675.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201009031507.29477.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100901042852.P29840@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4C80962F.1080700@icyb.net.ua> <201009031507.29477.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 03 September 2010 03:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 03 September 2010 02:31 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 03/09/2010 06:01 Ian Smith said the following: > > > But that's really an aside from the real issue you identify > > > below, and perhaps also some TZ value/s being 'absurd' .. > > > > Let's try to not mix these things together just yet. > > acpi_hp/acpi_wmi problems should not affect acpi_ec in any way. > > (the converse could be true, but let's not go there yet...) > > Uh... If I am reading acpi_wmi.c correctly, it installs its own > version of EC handler and EC is directly read/written via > ACPI_EC_READ() and ACPI_EC_WRITE() from there. Apparently, it just > bypasses EC serialization and "affects" EC. Am I reading it wrong? Please ignore what I just said. It is not attached properly, so it doesn't affect EC at all. Doh... Sorry for the noise. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201009031512.55675.jkim>