Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Nov 1996 13:13:03 -0500 (EST)
From:      pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co
To:        Satoshi Asami <asami@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Are broken ports useful?
Message-ID:  <Pine.A41.3.95.961119123142.41942B-100000@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
In-Reply-To: <199611190620.WAA27201@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks to everyone!
I tried (1) and then went straight to (3) I dropped the new port for cim
in ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/incoming!

Pedro.

On Mon, 18 Nov 1996, Satoshi Asami wrote:

> 
> There are three ways around this:
> 
> (1) Look at the configure script, see where it defines INSTALL_PROGRAM
>     and patch that to not include -s.  Then in your toplevel Makefile
>     (i.e., /usr/ports/foo/bar/Makefile), add a post-install: target to 
>     strip the real binaries.
> 
> (2) Look at the part in the Makefile.in that is using
>     ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} to install scripts and change that to
>     ${INSTALL} -m 555 or something.
> 
> Note that INSTALL_PROGRAM is passed through the environment to the
> configure script by bsd.port.mk, so configure might be picking that
> up.  If so, (1) won't work.  In which case:
> 
> (3) Add "STRIP=" (with nothing to the right of "=") in your toplevel
>     Makefile.  Then add a post-install: target like in (1).
> 
> Satoshi
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.A41.3.95.961119123142.41942B-100000>