Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 14:42:41 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: handy@sag.space.lockheed.com (Brian N. Handy) Subject: Re: malloc failed? Message-ID: <19970615144241.VR25113@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.96.970611091900.6291F-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com>; from Brian N. Handy on Jun 11, 1997 09:21:56 -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970610183318.21181A-100000@misery.sdf.com> <Pine.OSF.3.96.970611091900.6291F-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Brian N. Handy wrote: > > Also, back in 2.1, I ran into a problem where the max data size could > >not be increased greater than physical memory. I wonder if this could > >your problem too. > > Well, that's not my problem, I only have 80MB of physical memory. (I have > 240MB of swap, so I surmise that's not the problem either.) You're probably hitting the absolute hard limit. It's a compile-time option for your kernel. RTFLINT. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970615144241.VR25113>