Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Dec 1998 21:01:15 -0500 (EST)
From:      Oleg Ogurok <oleg@ogurok.com>
To:        sporkl@ix.netcom.com
Cc:        Albert Chen <chen6178@hotmail.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD is better than WinNT? please give me ten reasons.
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812162100080.1853-100000@ogurok.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981216195223.399C-100000@PigStuy.dyn.ml.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi.

BRAVO.
BTW, how about putting this e-mail into the FAQ list?
Thank you.

Oleg Ogurok
oleg@ogurok.com
http://www.ogurok.com

On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Spike Gronim wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Albert Chen wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm currenlty using FreeBSD. My advisor prefers WinNT,
> > I telled him to try FreeBSD, but he asked me: 
> > "Why FreeBSD is better than WinNT? give me ten reasons
> > and I will try it?" I don't know how to answer,
> > would anyone tell me, thanks.
> 
> 
> 1. FreeBSD is more efficient, and therefore well suited to high load
> server environments.
>  
> 2. FreeBSD has free, good tech support, as opposed to having to buy tech
> support from M$.
> 
> 3. FreeBSD is open source, so that if their is a bug found in a program
> distributed with it or somebody just wants to add some new feature to a
> program, they can. This means bugs get fixed sooner. 
> 
> 4. Easily customized- differnt shells, different GUIs, re-compilable
> kernel, easily altered network 
> 
> 5. Cheap- FreeBSD is free, you don't need to buy user licenses like you do
> with some M$ porducts. 
> 
> 6. Comes with lots of useful, free, well made programs. The ports
> collection has 1924 programs available on CD or from the Internet. All
> free. I have on my hard drive free C development tools, not to mention
> Perl, shell, tcl/tk, C++, lisp. I have networking tools- tcpdump, a
> firewall, and tcp port wrappers. I have the X Windowing system, a
> versatile and efficient base for my GUI. All these things would cost me
> money from M$, and from my experience with M$ they wouldn't work as well. 
> 
> 7. More secure- I once broke in to a WinNT system by accident while
> hitting random keys on the keyboard (this is true- I did this in front of
> witnesses)
> 
> 8. Great documentation- the system comes with manual pages for all the
> programs that come with it, and if the docs aren't enough you can go read
> the source to find what you need. 
> 
> 9. The system is verbose. With M$ operating systems, instead of telling
> you what it is doing it is busy displaying  a pretty splash screen. With
> FreeBSD, the system will tell you everything it can about what is going
> on- from why a program crashed to the memory address ranges it using to
> access your video card. 
> 
> 10. FreeBSD has decades of development behind it. The FreeBSD project was
> started in 1993, but BSD (the Berkeley Unix FreeBSD is based on) has been
> in development since the very early eighties, and the original AT&T Unix
> has been in development since the mid 1970's. 
> 
> Hope this convinces your advisor. 
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Albert
> 
> 
> 	-Spike Gronim
> 	 sporkl@ix.netcom.com	
> 
> 
> 		The majority only rules those who let them. 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9812162100080.1853-100000>