Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:07:24 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel J. O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Committers <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Subject: Re: Mandatory locking? Message-ID: <XFMail.990823210724.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199908230843.JAA51695@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23-Aug-99 Brian Somers wrote: > > I think its a good idea, and hey if people object it can always be an > > option > > like -> > > option NO_MANDATORY_LOCKING > Not quite - developers have to deal with the mess that it would cause > - Matt for example says: Well, I think it would be a useful option, so adding the ability to disable it would possibly keep the people that hate it happy :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990823210724.doconnor>