Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Apr 1999 12:03:15 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
To:        Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net>
Cc:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, current <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os 
Message-ID:  <199904081803.MAA64451@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Apr 1999 21:09:16 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904072108290.94006-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> 
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904072108290.94006-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904072108290.94006-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> Alex Zepeda writes:
: That was one of the BIG pitfalls of egcs, binary incompatable C++ programs
: and libs.  Sounds like you're overdue for your favorite shot of caffiene.

g++ and its derivitives have never been binary compatible for long.
I'm aware of at least three ABI breakagese since 2.4.x.  This is one
reason that OI/uib will no longer work on Linux systems :-(.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904081803.MAA64451>