Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:01:13 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: [PATCH] multiple instances of ipfw(4) Message-ID: <CAPBZQG32iyzkec4PG%2Bqay9bKfd0GiffKyRBapLkATKvHr7cVww@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, from needs on pfSense a patch for allowing multiple intances of ipfw(4) in kernel to co-exist was developed. It can be found here https://raw.github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-tools/master/patches/RELENG_9_0/CP_multi_instance_ipfw.diff It is used in conjuction with this tool https://raw.github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-tools/master/pfPorts/ipfw_context/files/ipfw_context.c It allows creation of contextes/instances and assignment of specific interfaces to specific contexts/instances. Surely i know that this is not the best way to implement generically but it gets the job done for us as it is, read below. What i would like to know is if there is interest to see such functionality in FreeBSD? I am asking first to see if there is some consensus about this as a feature, needed or not! If interest is shown i will transform the patch to allow: - ipfw(8) to manage the contextes create/destroy - ipfw(8) to manage interface membership. Closing the race of two parallell clients modifying different contextes. There is another design choice to be made about storing the membership of interfaces into contexts/instances, but i do not see that as blocking. It is quite handy feature, which can be exploited even to scale on SMP machines by extending it to bind a specific instance(with its interaces) to a specific CPU/core?! Comments/Feedback expected, Ermal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPBZQG32iyzkec4PG%2Bqay9bKfd0GiffKyRBapLkATKvHr7cVww>