Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 21:13:52 +1100 (EDT) From: Andrew MacIntyre <andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au> To: genght@cn.ibm.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE box more slow than slackware3.5 box? Message-ID: <Pine.OS2.3.95.990210211031.223A-100000@CENTRAL> In-Reply-To: <48256714.00124BCC.00@cn.ibm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 genght@cn.ibm.com wrote: > I have two boxes that have the same hardware.One is FreeBSD2.2.8-RELEASE > and the other is Slackware3.5. > They are using the same Intel 10/100 NIC and attaching to the same 10/100 > Bay 450T switch.But when I ftp/telnet to my FreeBSD box(either from win95 > client or from linux client),it responded after a very very long time (I > think it is dead,but not.)But the linux box work perfectly. {...} make sure that the machine you're telnet/ftp'ing from is reverse-resolvable, either by DNS or /etc/hosts. By default, FreeBSD does a reverse lookup on the incoming IP address to use a name for logging (at least that's my experience with 2.2.[567]). -- Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..." E-mail: andrew.macintyre@aba.gov.au (work) | Snail: PO Box 370 andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au (play) | Belconnen ACT 2616 Fido: Andrew MacIntyre, 3:620/243.18 | Australia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OS2.3.95.990210211031.223A-100000>