Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Jan 1999 08:00:37 +0100
From:      Thierry Herbelot <herbelot@cybercable.fr>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why doscmd isn't builded by default?
Message-ID:  <3695AD15.F1A06ED3@cybercable.fr>
References:  <199901080644.RAA07428@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote:
> 
> >I'm looking into -CURRENT src/usr.bin/Makefile and there isn't any
> >information about doscmd so it isn't builded by default.
> >Is there any reason not to build doscmd by default?
> 
> It needs to be linked to the X libraries to be of much use, and its
> configuration for linking to the X libraries is broken in many cases.
> The libraries must be in /usr/X11R6/lib, not in the aout subdirectory
> of that, and must be consistent with OBJFORMAT.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message


Hello,

Has someone a PC font with all semi-graphics characters ?
(ideally, a conversion of EGA.CPI to an X font ?)

	TfH

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3695AD15.F1A06ED3>