Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:34:33 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libc size Message-ID: <3DC177B9.902060E7@mindspring.com> References: <20021030233106.32D292A896@canning.wemm.org> <3DC06EB1.CCF3B30D@mindspring.com> <20021031080105.GA77041@tara.freenix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Terry Lambert: > > The PIC overhead is likely unavoidable. I'd actually like to see > > the "benchmark" run on statically linked PIC vs. non-PIC code, so > > I remember that when I was working on Perl and the FreeBSD port (back in the > early 5.000 days), having libperl shared was adding a fairly large > overhead. "make test" ran in between 15% and 25% more time in the shared > libperl case... I'm talking about statically linking the PIC code, to differentiate the PIC overhead from the shared library mechanism overhead. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DC177B9.902060E7>