Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 14:40:00 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Slava Shwartsman <slavash@FreeBSD.org> Cc: hselasky@FreeBSD.org, kib@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r333668 - vendor/tcpdump/dist Message-ID: <20180523214000.GT71675@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20180523212707.GS71675@FreeBSD.org> References: <201805160843.w4G8h8oW050800@repo.freebsd.org> <20180523212513.GR71675@FreeBSD.org> <20180523212707.GS71675@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:27:07PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:25:13PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> T> Hi, T> T> T> T> do we commit cherry-picks into vendor/ subversion space? I believe we don't. T> T> T> T> Cherry-picks should go directly to head. vendor/ should get only tagged T> T> full tree updates. T> T> Ehrm, and these two commits actually are already in head, since they came T> to tcpdump from us. T> T> What was the point of r333668? Sorry, I was wrong on my first email, but not in the second. We commit vendor patches to vendor/ area, but what r333668 brought it in is originally a FreeBSD patch. So I still can't understand the point of r333668. -- Gleb Smirnoff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180523214000.GT71675>