Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:06:51 -0800 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: rgrimes@freebsd.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r344567 - in head: etc/mtree include sbin sbin/veriexec Message-ID: <f917e2f2-67f5-e3f7-cb53-0768626b31c2@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20190226172358.GA67992@FreeBSD.org> References: <201902260617.x1Q6HOra098699@repo.freebsd.org> <201902260619.x1Q6Jjn2043418@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <20190226134953.GB39566@FreeBSD.org> <34ecb52f-c89e-0d5e-594e-25b0d045d171@FreeBSD.org> <20190226172358.GA67992@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/26/19 9:23 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:12:11AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: >> On 2/26/19 5:49 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:19:45PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >>>> ... >>>> Just a small nit, for future reference, from the template: >>>>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D### >>>> (*full* phabric URL needed). >>> >>> IMHO we should just fix the scripts to accept D#### alone, without >>> the URL. We don't do that for PR (bugzilla) references, and the fact >>> that we do for the phab is both needless and confusing. Also, that >>> URL might change one day while we could probably keep the old numbers >>> if we move. >> >> It makes the review clickable in many mail clients which is very handy. > > I understand that, but then again, we don't do that for PRs and people > don't seem to complain. Accepting D#### would make this all consistent > and commit messages cleaner. Arguably, if one likes to click the URLs > in their mail client, why not configure the client to expand the URL in > place? > >> -- >> John Baldwin >> >> \x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a\x9a > > Can you do something about this horde of \x9a's appended to your every > email John? Bizarre, that's the first time someone has mentioned that. It appears to be a misfeature of Thunderbird which I switched to last year after kmail in kde5 officially moved to "unusable trash fire" status. It doesn't show up locally, and the signature file I'm using doesn't contain them: % hexdump .signature 0000000 2d 2d 20 0a 4a 6f 68 6e 20 42 61 6c 64 77 69 6e 0000010 0a 0000011 Switching to using an inline signature instead of a signature file didn't fix it either. :( I haven't found an existing bug report for this yet. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f917e2f2-67f5-e3f7-cb53-0768626b31c2>