Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:15:15 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: Craig Boston <craig@xfoil.gank.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CardBus USB 2.0 Controller (NEC uPD) Message-ID: <20030612121514.GD26807@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <200306112247.01397.craig@xfoil.gank.org> References: <1055260269.91337.127.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> <20030611224538.GB10822@genius.tao.org.uk> <20030612002139.GT26807@cicely12.cicely.de> <200306112247.01397.craig@xfoil.gank.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:47:01PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2003 07:21 pm, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:45:38PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > The detach code could be made to work fairly easily. It's mostly there > > > I believe, but disabled. Nick couldn't convince himself that all the > > > used memory was being returned if the device is suddently unloaded. You > > > could suck it and see. > > > > I'm not shure if the code would work, but it was also ported into ehci > > and therefor ehci should be in a similar state. > > Well loosing memory is better than panic. > > I have no cardbus - can this be tested with a module? > > I'd be more than happy to give it a shot on my now-working cardbus card and > see what happens. > > It is as simple as adding > DEVMETHOD(device_detach, ohci_pci_detach) > to the device_method_t ? Yes + the same for ehci. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030612121514.GD26807>