Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:53:32 -1000 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Christer Hermansson <mail@chdevelopment.se> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nat and ipfw - divert or builtin Message-ID: <46F68BFC.7030800@psg.com> In-Reply-To: <46F68B1C.6020303@chdevelopment.se> References: <46F5FF0A.7030203@psg.com> <46F68B1C.6020303@chdevelopment.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would > choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network > that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated > variant beacuse it seems to be simpler to use. and one less daemon. less code is better code. i will likely give it a try. thanks. randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46F68BFC.7030800>