Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 16:13:21 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@time.cdrom.com Subject: Re: /usr/ports/filesystems Message-ID: <199809142313.QAA03530@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <yzsvhmq4qkv.fsf@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu> (rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: rvb@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu * I wanted to propose that we introduce a new directory under ports to * place file systems related ports. My main reason for suggesting this * was to create a logical place to put the CODA pieces: coda_client, * coda_server and some coda_doc related pieces. But I thought other * ports could go there as well, afs -- when it exists. Also /net/ is * a rather overused place, so perhaps samba belongs in filesystems and * perhaps the crypto fs (cfs -- currently in security). cfs should probably stay in security, but I agree with everything else. (Especially if it encourages someone to make an afs port. :) * Lastly, I prefer the longer name, filesystems, to something like fs * which I think is too cryptic. I think filesystems is fine in this case. I'm all for saving letters but it doesn't have to go all the way down to 2 bytes. ;) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809142313.QAA03530>