Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:57:37 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> Cc: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@FreeBSD.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 135666 for review Message-ID: <20080221095737.GF73371@dracon.ht-systems.ru> In-Reply-To: <47BD4799.3000209@semihalf.com> References: <200802181742.m1IHgrku061009@repoman.freebsd.org> <11B9D4C0-6B4B-4A3C-A1A3-95060785BEFF@mac.com> <47B9DBD8.3090100@semihalf.com> <20080218194743.GB73371@dracon.ht-systems.ru> <47BD4799.3000209@semihalf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:42:49AM +0100 Rafal Jaworowski mentioned: > Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:26:16PM +0100 Rafal Jaworowski mentioned: > >> The reason I did not put the (c) originally is I wasn't sure how to do it > >> properly and simply followed U-Boot's export.h direction. It is desirable that > >> this header file be verbatim copy of U-Boot's since it describes the API > >> interface, but their files need to be GPL, ours BSD. So I left this without > >> one, as the export.h does in similar case. > >> > >> Any advice on such matter? Anyone else has the clue? > >> > > > > I suppose, it'd be better to either ask Denk to release it in public domain, or > > reimplement the header ourselves. It'd be not very difficult to keep it in sync > > with u-boot by hand. > > > > I wrote this file, and the main concern is about NOT having a separately > maintained one, but just a copy from U-Boot reference file. I spoke with > Wolfgang and he was kind of reluctant to the public domain route, but we > agreed on dual-licensing (BSD/GPL) it. > Good news! -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080221095737.GF73371>