Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:25:37 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UIDs Message-ID: <4DFBB841.5020104@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DF7CF8E.7000703@FreeBSD.org> References: <201106141639.p5EGdJ2k003510@repoman.freebsd.org> <1308083456.84213.7.camel@hood.oook.cz> <BANLkTi=FeXUcAxE8ReP%2BJtJWxSGoVTEiOA@mail.gmail.com> <4DF7CF8E.7000703@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/14/2011 14:15, Olli Hauer wrote: > I think it's not a bad Idea to have even the default system > users in ports/GIDs ports/UIDs. I agree. You never know when users may have removed stuff because it was previously unused. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DFBB841.5020104>