Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Jul 1997 09:26:47 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@dk.tfs.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        ache@nagual.pp.ru, brian@awfulhak.org, current@freebsd.org, chuckr@Glue.umd.edu, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject:   Re: ppp & HUP. 
Message-ID:  <3858.867914807@critter.dk.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Jul 1997 13:02:24 %2B1000." <199707030302.NAA26921@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199707030302.NAA26921@godzilla.zeta.org.au>, Bruce Evans writes:
>>If nobody will explain why this HUP is neded (hanging shells perfectly
>>killed by SIGKILL), I'll remove HUP sending from init.
>
>SIGHUP may have been to allow shells to propagate SIGHUP to children.
>There may still be some problems here for parts of the process tree
>not killed by the death of the controlling process.  Perhaps shells
>do a more complete job of propagating the SIGHUP?

SIGHUP to processes with a controling tty, SIGTERM to the rest ?

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@tfs.com           TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3858.867914807>