Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:51:06 +0200 (CEST) From: "Julien Gabel" <jpeg@thilelli.net> To: "Pav Lucistnik" <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/83033: [PATCH] Update of the www/nanoblogger port. Message-ID: <61117.192.168.1.20.1120683066.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <200507061559.j66FxDJ6092055@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200507061559.j66FxDJ6092055@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Synopsis: [PATCH] Update of the www/nanoblogger port. > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: pav > State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 6 15:58:30 GMT 2005 > State-Changed-Why: > Your patch does not apply onto the port. Please resend your patch and make > sure whitespace does not change, especially that tabulators don't get > changed to spaces. > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav > Responsible-Changed-By: pav > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 6 15:58:30 GMT 2005 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Track > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=83033 Ok. With a fresh cvsup'ed /usr/ports, i get the following results: # cd /usr/ports # patch < /tmp/nanoblogger.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/Makefile www/nanoblogger/Makefile |--- www/nanoblogger.old/Makefile Mon Dec 27 04:39:14 2004 |+++ www/nanoblogger/Makefile Tue Jul 5 19:34:04 2005 -------------------------- Patching file www/nanoblogger/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 7. Hunk #2 succeeded at 15. Hunk #3 succeeded at 27. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/distinfo www/nanoblogger/distinfo |--- www/nanoblogger.old/distinfo Mon Dec 27 04:39:14 2004 |+++ www/nanoblogger/distinfo Tue Jul 5 19:45:10 2005 -------------------------- Patching file www/nanoblogger/distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/files/patch-nb www/nanoblogger/files/patch-nb |--- www/nanoblogger.old/files/patch-nb Fri Nov 12 16:30:57 2004 |+++ www/nanoblogger/files/patch-nb Tue Jul 5 19:34:04 2005 -------------------------- Patching file www/nanoblogger/files/patch-nb using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -ruN www/nanoblogger.old/pkg-descr www/nanoblogger/pkg-descr |--- www/nanoblogger.old/pkg-descr Thu Jul 15 10:20:04 2004 |+++ www/nanoblogger/pkg-descr Tue Jul 5 19:34:04 2005 -------------------------- Patching file www/nanoblogger/pkg-descr using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 4. done It is certainly a problem using copy and paste in send-pr(1). You can found the corresponding patch at: http://www.thilelli.net/~jgabel/pub/PR/83033/ Here is the MD5 checksum for the patch: # md5 nanoblogger.patch MD5 (nanoblogger.patch) = c224ebeb996d5f25092f204aa325b92c -- -jpeg. "The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected." Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd Ed., June 12, 1972
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61117.192.168.1.20.1120683066.squirrel>