Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 22:09:28 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> To: el.nadow@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Thunar and Xfce-4.4 Message-ID: <20060904220928.079ba635.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <bf79ce230609041250k7f41b00djea030b10a67b2cf4@mail.gmail.com> References: <bf79ce230609041044i4477585ay21c52ff602d05a29@mail.gmail.com> <20060904203746.ac81ff81.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <bf79ce230609041244j7e0480f9t180e8595794a779c@mail.gmail.com> <bf79ce230609041250k7f41b00djea030b10a67b2cf4@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nadow wrote: > Excuse my ignorance but, Cant be beta or RC versions of programs in the > ports tree?. You know, like enlighteenment-0.17 which has been (and It is > still) a beta for 5 years and it is in the ports tree as > enlightenment-0.16.999.0.2 > > Thank you for your time Problem here is that right now there are 47 ports I've changed or added for xfce 4.4 (rc, beta). And I find it kinda bloated to duplicate each of those ports to create a "-devel" version. Think about it, this would include every xfce component and plugin and so on... I like it more the way gnome folks are doing it by only checking in final releases, and providing the "in between" states online as I do... http://people.freebsd.org/~oliver/xfce/ Right now, as mentioned, I'm working on a rc1 patchset/shar archive and I'll post the link here as I did it since xfce 4.0 was beta.... -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060904220928.079ba635.lehmann>