Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:19:06 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Failover default route? Message-ID: <20070818111906.c3c8fee9.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200708181421.l7IEL8eG057505@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> References: <200708181421.l7IEL8eG057505@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I know its been talked about before, did 1/2 an > hour of Google... > > In my case, as always, its a bit "special". I have > 2 OPENVPN tunnels, which I sent over different transits to > the same end host. On that host, I do my NAT. SO, without > getting into all sorts of hot/heavy things, is there a simple > program to install to ping something via the first tunnel, > and if it can't then switch my default route to the second > tunnel? Or, do I just use a script like here : The protocols designed to handle this are things like RIP and BGP. However, in a case like yours, where you control both ends of things, it's probably better to just use a script. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070818111906.c3c8fee9.wmoran>