Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 13:52:41 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@citusc.usc.edu> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@citusc.usc.edu>, "James E. Housley" <jeh@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/perforce Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/devel/perforce/files perforce perforce.sh.in Message-ID: <20001028135241.A13487@citusc17.usc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20001028112610.A74503@cichlids.cichlids.com>; from alex@big.endian.de on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 11:26:10AM %2B0200 References: <200010280132.SAA02179@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001027183856.A9179@citusc17.usc.edu> <20001028112610.A74503@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 11:26:10AM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Kris Kennaway (kris@citusc.usc.edu): > > > > Update? from version 99.2 to 00.1 (Funny math). Added PORTEPOCH=1 > > Yay for Y2K bugs in version numbers! > > Yes. This will probably break any latter upgrade-path. It shouldn't - thats what PORTEPOCH is for. > Can't we just use internal-versions, like 2000.01? We could have, but it's done now. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001028135241.A13487>