Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:26:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Bryan Liesner <bleez@comcast.net> To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM) Message-ID: <20030918191320.V461@gravy.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: <20030918193255.GB76387@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <1062861719.2761.35.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <1063763321.776.2.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030917070959.L458@gravy.homeunix.net> <1063847031.804.4.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030918193255.GB76387@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: > Le 2003-09-18, Guillaume =E9crivait : > > > The patch does nothing for me. Same results... and cd0 is still slow. > > OK, then please try to apply the patch below in addition to the previous > one: > Sorry, I hadn't really noticed or checked for speed issues before the first patch that you issued, only that I noticed the reported speed went from 3.3MB/s to 33.3MB/s. There is a new issue, though. Soren commited a change to ata-queue.c this morning. This change together with atapicam, causes the system to hang indefinitely after detecting ad0. Had to hit the reset button and boot from the previous kernel. Without atapicam, the system boots normally. -Bryan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030918191320.V461>