Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 10:04:16 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: "darshan na" <darshan.na@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hello :Regarding the vulnerability Message-ID: <20070503100416.d3d714d4.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <387cde1b0705030641x6e6c2de5r4e1daa45ce74eb9a@mail.gmail.com> References: <387cde1b0705030455p39566970uf40663721eabaeea@mail.gmail.com> <20070503083845.52414031.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <387cde1b0705030641x6e6c2de5r4e1daa45ce74eb9a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to "darshan na" <darshan.na@gmail.com>: > Hi. > Thanks for the reply > I am really sorry It was my mistake for not checking properly > After reading again I have realised that you specify the impact and > workaround for FreeBSD releases and you provide links to their > sources .Please correct me if I am wrong I am new to this field . You are obviously new, but that's OK. We all start out new. First off, questions@freebsd.org is a mailing list for general discussion about FreeBSD. The fact that I responded to you post in no way identifies me as an expert that should be exclusively consulted for further information. As a result, I've added questions@freebsd.org back to the CC. The FreeBSD project maintains a truckload of mailing lists to facilitate collaboration within the community: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL Of particular interest to you might be this list: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security Top-posting is also generally frowned apon. > I also wanted to know what features to you consider when publishing the > vulnerability Information about how the security team operates is here: http://www.freebsd.org/security/ If you have a number of questions, I expect you'll benefit from organizing them all into a single email and sending them (interview-style) to the FreeBSD security officer (listed on the previous page). Hope this helps. > On 5/3/07, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote: > > > > In response to "darshan na" <darshan.na@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi , > > > I am student at one of the German Universtiy and i had a task of > > > Benchmarking the Vulenrability Providers based on the features they > > provide > > > and ,its really nice that you provide vulnerablity information in xml > > format > > > and this is really very useful to parse this information for analysis > > > i was checking your website where advisiories are present and i could > > not > > > find any risk level alloted to the vulnerability > > > It is difficult to analyse them without that , I just wanted to know is > > > there any particular reason for this > > > > Did you miss section III (called "Impact") that appears in every Advisory? > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070503100416.d3d714d4.wmoran>