Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 19:28:42 +0000 From: Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi?= Guyomarch <rguyom@pobox.com> Cc: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>, snap-users@kame.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au, altq@csl.sony.co.jp Subject: Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing together ... Message-ID: <3AEF0E6A.2E9B34A0@aurora.regenstrief.org> References: <3AEEEE79.8F7CC7B0@aurora.regenstrief.org> <3AEEF26B.C6850070@isi.edu> <3AEEF59D.3D5622DE@aurora.regenstrief.org> <20010501205741.A30269@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rémi Guyomarch wrote: > IIRC you can put a bandwidth limiter on a virtual interface (this is > even the only solution to use ALTQ on tun or ppp devices) and thus > provide a queue which can be managed by ALTQ. Aha! A Light! How is that done? Can you give more specifics? Thanks, I appreciate it! -Gunther -- Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow@regenstrief.org Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care Adjunct Assistent Professor Indiana University School of Medicine tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AEF0E6A.2E9B34A0>