Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:54:11 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org>, Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [src] cvs commit: src/sys/sys param.h src/sys/conf newvers.sh Message-ID: <20040818075411.GA91053@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <412301F0.2070307@alumni.rice.edu> References: <200408180021.i7I0LCCK020175@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040818002136.03A8B16A524@hub.freebsd.org> <20040818060547.GB6348@ip.net.ua> <412301F0.2070307@alumni.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:14:56AM -0500, Jon Noack wrote: > On 08/18/04 01:05, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:21:36AM +0000, Scott Long wrote: > >>Index: src/sys/sys/param.h > > > >[...] > > > >> * scheme is: <major><two digit minor><0 if release branch, otherwise= =20 > >> 1>xx > >> */ > >> #undef __FreeBSD_version > >>-#define __FreeBSD_version 502128 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > >>+#define __FreeBSD_version 600000 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > > ^^^^^^ > >I believe this should be 600100, or are we changing the scheme > >again? >=20 > No, 600000 is correct. The reason is that 600100 will be used for=20 > 6-CURRENT *after* a 6.0-RELEASE. 6-CURRENT before and *including*=20 > 6.0-RELEASE should follow the 6000xx scheme. Note that this is=20 > unchanged from the way 5-CURRENT and 5.0-RELEASE (which ended up being=20 > 500043) were handled: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/freebsd= -versions.html >=20 You're right. I was confused by a misleading comment in <sys/param.h>: scheme is: <major><two digit minor><0 if release branch, otherwise 1>xx This should actually read: scheme is: <major><two digit minor>Rxx R is 0 if release branch or x.0-CURRENT before RELENG_x_0 is created, otherwise 1 Scott, would this be an appropriate time now to discuss my proposals to the release naming, and what would be an appropriate forum then? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBIwsjqRfpzJluFF4RAkJrAJ96sD+mT+77N2jgOdAfW8ZH5WXvEQCfWYC5 HdjOY+u491bZrea5OH5AHaU= =tI7s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040818075411.GA91053>