Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:57:40 -0600 From: Eric <heli@mikestammer.com> To: Agus <agus.262@gmail.com> Cc: Brett Davidson <brett@net24.co.nz>, Atom Powers <atom.powers@gmail.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advice on which FreeBSD firewall package to choose. Message-ID: <459E7574.2000303@mikestammer.com> In-Reply-To: <fda61bb50701050721q7690f9b1u7b23c0f34c6f58ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <60224D09909C0B43A50935A0893D8FF31DA2DC@srv.exchange.net24.net.nz> <459D76E6.2030904@mikestammer.com> <df9ac37c0701041637i7c521a92g29732caaa4f3f078@mail.gmail.com> <459E0E2F.8010505@infracaninophile.co.uk> <fda61bb50701050721q7690f9b1u7b23c0f34c6f58ae@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Agus wrote: > It seems is unanimous....PF it is....remember u have to compile the > Kernel > to activate this, i´ve done it for the first time, yesterday and its very > simple....also checkout the ALTQ for QoS, good luck just pf does not require touching the kernel, you can load the module, you just need the rc.conf entries for it ALTQ is another story tho. that needs to be in the kernel.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?459E7574.2000303>