Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:42:11 -0700 From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> To: "Hiroki Sato" <hrs@freebsd.org>, <net@freebsd.org>, <re@freebsd.org> Cc: qingli@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IPv6 regression on 8.x Message-ID: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A430521B61E@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> In-Reply-To: <20090827.022654.83897589.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20090827.022654.83897589.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Hiroki, > <SNIP> > > 1) Scope violation in a simple global unicast address: >=20 > 2) Issue of subnet-router anycast address with a global address on > another I/F: > > <SNIP>=20 I have fixed the above regression issues last week, but due to traveling, I did not commit the fix until about 5 minutes ago. Please sync-up to "svn-r196569" and let me know how the patch works out for you. I have tested the patch myself using your examples and the patch produces the expected results. This patch also fixes another issue, and using your example,=20 where packets received on em0 that are destined for either re0=20 or em1 cannot get any response packets. >=20 > 3) Manually-configured subnet routes disapper on receiving RA: >=20 >=20 > --> This symptom occurs on 7.1R and later, including 8.x and > 9-current, not 7.0R. Even by doing a manual configuration, the > routes on the RA-receiving I/F can not be added. >=20 The new L2/L3 rewrite only applies to 8.x and 9-current. Since this symptom occurs also on 7.1R, and this is the first I heard of it,=20 I will investigate further and get back to you, soon. Thanks, -- Qing
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A430521B61E>