Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:54:49 -0800
From:      Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
To:        freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>,  freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   How to use zfs send -R without risking union mounts?
Message-ID:  <52D83909.3080809@bluerosetech.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
When you send -R a filesystem, it very nicely retains all of the 
properties.  That also includes the mountpoint property.  Setting 
canmount=off is the only safeguard against mounting a filesystem 
accidentally and it can't be inherited.  That means it's rather 
dangerous to send -R the filesystems on which the OS reside.

I want to create a backup using a process like:

Create the initial full backup:

zpool create backup /dev/gpt/backup
zfs create backup/tank
zfs send -R tank@yesterday | zfs recv -F backup/tank
zpool export backup

Then do incremental backups:

zpool import -N backup
zfs send -R -I tank@yesterday tank@today | zfs recv -F backup/tank
zpool export backup

The problem I ran into is zfs can mount the contents of backup/tank. 
Normally if you try to mount a ZFS filesystem at a non-empty directory, 
it gives the error:

mountpoint '/foo' exists and is not empty

During testing, I inadvertently dropped the -N flag to zpool import and 
ZFS successfully mounted everything on the backup drive over top of the 
live systems!  I had two mounts for /, /var, /usr, /home, etc. 
Imagining the hell of that happening in production, with active 
filesystems, is an exercise for the reader.

How do you force ZFS to never automatically mount a filesystem or any of 
its descendants?  You can't recursively set properties and canmount 
can't be inherited, so I'm stuck on how to enforce this critical bit of 
safety.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52D83909.3080809>