Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:30:24 +0100 From: "Metz, E.T." <E.T.Metz@kpn.com> To: 'Dennis' <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: 'FreeBSD Hackers mailing list' <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Metz, E.T." <E.T.Metz@kpn.com>, "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>, "'dg@root.com'" <dg@root.com>, "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com> Subject: RE: yet another unsupported PHY in fxp driver Message-ID: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E45220316A6E9@l04.research.kpn.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As far as I know there is no progress yet. I understood from the replies (and searching the archive) that Intel has the key to the solution, in that they need to provide the required information on what has changed in the rev-8 cards. I'm not sure what else can be done, can there? Possible suggestion: treat the newest Intel card as one of "known" past cards, and see how it works?? cheers, Eduard > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis [mailto:dennis@etinc.com] > Sent: maandag 18 december 2000 17:26 > To: Koster, K.J.; 'dg@root.com'; Koster, K.J. > Cc: 'FreeBSD Hackers mailing list'; Metz, E.T. > Subject: RE: yet another unsupported PHY in fxp driver > > > Any word on the latest "Unsupported PHY" , or info that will > help me or > someone else fix it? > > DB > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E45220316A6E9>