Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:49:56 +0100 From: John Murphy <jfm@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Khalil.Haddad@ubs.com Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP Nat or NATd Message-ID: <mjkoktset38dpphgtb6kdbfjea03nmjutr@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <H0000152004f0651.0994839931.ps3p84.par.swissbank.com@MHS> References: <H0000152004f0651.0994839931.ps3p84.par.swissbank.com@MHS>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Khalil.Haddad@ubs.com wrote: >Hello all, > >I have a ppp xDSL connection. I am currently using the internal ppp NAT=20 >to manage my internat network. For now this system is working as a=20 >charm. > >I would like to ask you wether I should use NATd ? > >I am asking myself this because I might in a near future need more NAT=20 >functions like port redirecting etc ... ppp nat does port redirection. From man 8 ppp nat port proto targetIP:targetPort[-targetPort] aliasPort[-aliasPort] [remoteIP:remotePort[-remotePort]] This command causes incoming proto connections to aliasPort to be redirected to targetPort on targetIP. proto is either ``tcp'' or = ``udp''. >And I am also curious of what you all think about ppp nat vs. NATd. I find the set filter alive and set filter dial features very useful for dial up modems. John. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?mjkoktset38dpphgtb6kdbfjea03nmjutr>