Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:25:01 -0800
From:      Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
To:        Albert Vest <alvest@earthlink.net>
Cc:        freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [FreeBSD Ports Version Check] Newer available versions for ports you maintain
Message-ID:  <1136593501.15045.69.camel@leguin>
In-Reply-To: <20060106190344.682c4627.alvest@earthlink.net>
References:  <20060105210623.AF608196C@k7.mavetju> <20060106190344.682c4627.alvest@earthlink.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-q0iB6C2gKN5df/bbxckg
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 19:03 -0500, Albert Vest wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 21:06:23 UT
> Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> > As maintainer of one or more FreeBSD ports, I would like to inform
> > you that a new version is available for the following port(s):
> >=20
> > Port                                 Current version New version
> URLs
> > ------------------------------------ --------------- -----------
> ----
> > devel/imake-6                        6.8.2           6.9.0       [1]
> ...
> > x11-servers/xorg-server              6.8.2           6.9.0
> [13]
> > x11-servers/xorg-server-snap         6.8.99.903      6.8.99.904
> [14]
> > x11-servers/xorg-vfbserver           6.8.2           6.9.0
> [15]
> ...
>=20
> I'm looking forward to this.  I've been monitoring  freshports.org
> since you posted, but I haven't seen any of these commits show up yet.
>=20
> One thing I don't understand is why you plan to bump xorg-server-snap
> so little.  I thought this port (like graphics/dri-devel) was supposed
> to be more bleeding-edge current than it's official counterpart.  E.g.
> when xorg-server goes to 6.9.0, shouldn't xorg-server-snap go up to
> (at least) 6.9.1 ?

(wrapping fixed)

There is no 6.9.0.1 snapshot (6.9.1 being a name that would be for a
stable release, not a snapshot), so xorg-server-snap isn't updated to
it.  There in fact haven't been any commits to the 6.9 branch that I
recall.  7.0 is the future, and we should get on the bandwagon soon.

--=20
Eric Anholt                                     eta@lclark.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/              anholt@FreeBSD.org

--=-q0iB6C2gKN5df/bbxckg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBDvwpdHUdvYGzw6vcRApiWAKCM7do9zZO9uONwXnpqiGHeb9mrjgCff4L5
uewqS6AsMFior4kmN/GBLZc=
=Dxg/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-q0iB6C2gKN5df/bbxckg--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1136593501.15045.69.camel>