Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:20:17 GMT From: "R. B. Riddick" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/111101: /usr/bin/lockf: when lockf blocks due to another lockf and no -k is specified and the other lockf ends, the file is away Message-ID: <200704012020.l31KKHiu079773@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/111101; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "R. B. Riddick" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/111101: /usr/bin/lockf: when lockf blocks due to another lockf and no -k is specified and the other lockf ends, the file is away Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 13:18:44 -0700 (PDT) --- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:11:04PM -0700, R. B. Riddick wrote: > OK, if you dont want to pursue a documentation improvement then I'll > close the PR. > Then I will continue to think, that lockf without -k is useless in many cases and very fünny/surprising/undöcumented. -Arne ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704012020.l31KKHiu079773>