Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:21:14 -0400 From: stan <stanb@panix.com> To: Bob <bob@tania.servebbs.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top and multiple CPU's Message-ID: <20060714002114.GA25387@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <44B6D0B1.5030007@tania.servebbs.org> References: <20060713123214.GA30789@teddy.fas.com> <ef4898ff0607130538r602da3aegb4f8938dad424d8f@mail.gmail.com> <20060713201653.GA18143@teddy.fas.com> <54db43990607131503w6203cbb8t46e478a008895b52@mail.gmail.com> <44B6D0B1.5030007@tania.servebbs.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:01:05PM -0400, Bob wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bob Johnson wrote: > > I don't have a 6.1 SMP system > > to test it on. > > > > On a brand nwe 6,1 SMP system the first 2 lines of top -S > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 11 root 1 171 52 0K 8K RUN 1 36.8H 90.38% idle:cpu1 > 12 root 1 171 52 0K 8K RUN 0 36.1H 90.33% idle:cpu0 > > [...] > > 757 bob 1 96 0 26128K 12340K CPU0 0 27:30 2.05% Xorg > 797 bob 1 96 0 28976K 8424K select 1 46:19 0.73% kdeinit > Interesting >From my machine: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 1 171 52 0K 16K RUN 29.9H 99.02% idle 38 root 1 20 0 0K 16K syncer 2:01 0.00% syncer 24 root 1 -68 -187 0K 16K WAIT 1:28 0.00% irq21: nve0 ehci0 13 root 1 -32 -151 0K 16K WAIT 1:10 0.00% swi4: clock sio This leads me to think I have not gotten SMP working corectly on this machine. Is this a correct assumption? Also, I must admit to some amazement as to how diferntly top presents similar data on differeing OS'es. -- U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror - New York Times 9/3/1967
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060714002114.GA25387>