Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:32:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>, julian@elischer.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libc_r in stable Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10209241329470.3943-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3D909F67.CE03D475@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Set SA_RESTART in the sa_flags of the sigaction for the scheduling > > > signal. Use "man sigaction" for details. > > > > Yes, for application installed signal handlers. > > > > Try this for library installed signal handlers (patch > > to -current). > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/libc_r.diffs > > Most of this diff is good, but... > > - act.sa_flags = SA_RESTART | SA_SIGINFO; > + act.sa_flags = SA_RESTART | SA_SIGINFO | SA_RESTART; > > Setting the bejesus out of the bit probably isn't more effective > than setting it once. It means we're trying much harder to restart the system call. The kernel will see this; trust me ;-) Actually, SA_ONSTACK should be substituted for one of the SA_RESTARTs. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10209241329470.3943-100000>