Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 23:44:28 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass9573@gmx.com> To: Sebastiaan van Erk <sebster@sebster.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CARP & bridge Message-ID: <49FB5F2C.6080502@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <49FAAF1C.6040802@sebster.com> References: <49F81FF2.3040302@sebster.com> <1240999037.2645.3.camel@frodon.be-bif.ulb.ac.be> <49F8269E.2010201@sebster.com> <49F89FE1.6070807@freemail.gr> <49F8CC51.2030203@sebster.com> <49F94E25.6000900@gmx.com> <49FAAF1C.6040802@sebster.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: > So I don't really *NEED* the CARP ip address over the bridge (the static > arp works, so I have a working solution, albeit an ugly one; an ARP > request generates a reply from every member of the redundant cluster). Just a guess, you could try adding the VIP/32 to the tap interface, instead of the static arp thing. Don't know if it will work, it is just a guess, which looks - to me - like a cleaner configuration. At least it's rc.conf friendly. Just my 0.000000002 euros, Nikos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49FB5F2C.6080502>